Krupp proposed mounting a new main weapon the (10.5 cm KwK L/68). Wa Pruef 6 was not supportive of this as the Heer had not accepted the cannon itself. Other suggested improvements included stabilized sights, stabilized main gun, automatic ammunition feed, a Zeiss stereoscopic range finder, heated crew compartment, stowage for an additional 12 rounds, and an overpressure and air filtration system to protect against poison gas, but these also never got beyond the proposal stage or did not enter production before the war ended.
Так есть все ж однозначный ответ: чьи танки ВМВ были объективно лучше? Я про техническую сторону - стратегическое и оперативное управление у немцев было на порядок выше чем у прочих участников этой бойни, это общепризнанный факт как бы.
Пользователь mauzer98k сослался на вашу запись в своей записи «И на посошок (http://mauzer98k.livejournal.com/45613.html)» в контексте: [...] Оригинал взят у в И на посошок [...]
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
no subject
Krupp proposed mounting a new main weapon the (10.5 cm KwK L/68). Wa Pruef 6 was not supportive of this as the Heer had not accepted the cannon itself. Other suggested improvements included stabilized sights, stabilized main gun, automatic ammunition feed, a Zeiss stereoscopic range finder, heated crew compartment, stowage for an additional 12 rounds, and an overpressure and air filtration system to protect against poison gas, but these also never got beyond the proposal stage or did not enter production before the war ended.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
И на посошок
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-30 04:14 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-30 09:35 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-31 08:07 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-04-01 04:27 pm (UTC)(link)no subject